Input check sequence modification for gas efficiency#1043
Merged
Conversation
Users tend to attempt to over-spend more than they attempt to burn non-burnable tokens. If the contract checks for overspending before assuring tokens are not being burnt a slight amount of gas might be saved in the long term.
nventuro
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2018
Contributor
|
Thanks @lucasgleba! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚀 Description
The order in which the parameters of two transfer functions are checked to be valid (to avoid over-spending and token-burning) has been altered so that they fail as soon as possible a bigger fraction of the time.
Regular users tend to attempt to over-spend more than they attempt to burn non-burnable tokens. If the contract checks for overspending before assuring tokens are not being burnt, a small amount of gas will be saved in the long term as the average number of operations executed per failed attempt will be smaller.
npm run lint:all:fix).