|
| 1 | +# Predictive density gradient theory |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Predictive density gradient theory (pDGT) is an efficient approach for the prediction of surface tensions, which is derived from non-local DFT, see [Rehner et al. (2018)](https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.063312). A gradient expansion is applied to the weighted densities of the Helmholtz energy functional to second order as well as to the Helmholtz energy density to first order. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Weighted densities (in non-local DFT) are determined from |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +$$ n_\alpha(\mathbf{r})=\sum_in_\alpha^i(\mathbf{r})=\sum_i\int\rho_i(\mathbf{r}- \mathbf{r}')\omega_\alpha^i(\mathbf{r}')\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}'.$$ |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +These convolutions are time-consuming calculations. Therefore, these equations are simplified by using a Taylor expansion around $\mathbf{r}$ for the density of each component $\rho_i$ as |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +$$\rho_i(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}')=\rho_i(\mathbf{r})-\nabla\rho_i(\mathbf{r})\cdot \mathbf{r}'+\frac{1}{2}\nabla\nabla\rho(\mathbf{r}):\mathbf{r}'\mathbf{r}'+\ldots$$ |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +In the convolution integrals, the integration over angles can now be performed analytically for the spherically symmetric weight functions $\omega_\alpha^i(\mathbf{r})=\omega_\alpha^i(r)$ |
| 14 | +which provides |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +$$ n_\alpha^i(\mathbf{r})=\rho_i(\mathbf{r})\underbrace{4\pi\int_0^\infty \omega_\alpha^i(r)r^2\mathrm{d} r}_{\omega_\alpha^{i0}} |
| 17 | + +\nabla^2\rho_i(\mathbf{r})\underbrace{\frac{2}{3}\pi\int_0^\infty\omega_\alpha^i(r)r^4\mathrm{d} r}_{\omega_\alpha^{i2}}+\ldots$$ |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +with the weight constants $\omega_\alpha^{i0}$ and $\omega_\alpha^{i2}$. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +The resulting weighted densities can be split into a local part $n_\alpha^0(\mathbf{r})$ and an excess part $\Delta n_\alpha(\mathbf{r})$ as |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +$$n_\alpha(\mathbf{r})=\underbrace{\sum_i\rho_i(\mathbf{r}) \omega_\alpha^{i0}}_{n_\alpha^0} +\underbrace{\sum_i\nabla^2\rho_i(\mathbf{r})\omega_\alpha^{i2}+\ldots}_{\Delta n_\alpha}.$$ |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The second simplification is the expansion of the reduced residual |
| 27 | +Helmholtz energy density $\Phi(\{ n_\alpha\})$ around the local density approximation truncated after the second term |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +$$ \Phi(\lbrace n_\alpha\rbrace) |
| 30 | + =\Phi(\lbrace n_\alpha^0\rbrace) |
| 31 | + +\sum_i\sum_\alpha\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial n_\alpha}\omega_\alpha^{i2}\nabla^2\rho_i + \ldots $$ |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +The Helmholtz energy functional (which was introduced in the section about the [Euler-Lagrange equation](euler_lagrange_equation.md)) then reads |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +$$ F[\mathbf{\rho}(\mathbf{r})]=\int\left(f(\mathbf{\rho})+\sum_{ij}\frac{c_{ij}(\mathbf{\rho})}{2}\nabla\rho_i\cdot\nabla\rho_j\right)\mathrm{d}\mathbf{r}$$ |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +with the density dependent influence parameter |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +$$ \beta c_{ij}(\mathbf{\rho})=-\sum_{\alpha\beta}\frac{\partial^2\Phi}{\partial n_\alpha\partial n_\beta}\left(\omega_\alpha^{i2}\omega_\beta^{j0}+ \omega_\alpha^{i0}\omega_\beta^{j2}\right).$$ |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +and the local Helmholtz energy density $f(\mathbf{\rho})$. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +For pure components, as derived in the original publication, the surface tension can be calculated from the surface excess grand potential per area according to |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +$$ \gamma=\frac{F-\mu N+pV}{A}=\int_{\rho^\mathrm{V}}^{\rho^\mathrm{L}} \sqrt{2c \left(f(\rho)-\rho\mu+p\right) } d\rho $$ |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +Thus, no iterative solver is necessary to calculate the surface tension of pure components, which is a major advantage of pDGT. Finally, the density profile can be calculated from |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +$$ z(\rho)=\int_{\rho^\mathrm{V}}^{\rho} \sqrt{\frac{c/2}{ f(\rho)-\rho\mu+p} } d\rho $$ |
| 53 | + |
0 commit comments