DOC clarify pandas DataFrame hash cache misses#1817
Draft
sapunyangkut wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
joblib.hashvalues intentionally cause a conservative cache missValidation
DataFrame.equalsis true while the twojoblib.hashvalues differpython -m pytest -q doc/user_guide/memory.rst— 1 passedgit diff --checkThe full Sphinx build was not run locally because the optional documentation dependency set is not installed; the repository's focused doctest for the edited page passed.
Closes #1611
AI assistance disclosure
This documentation change was prepared with AI assistance. The issue discussion, current hashing implementation, all 67 open pull requests, repository policies, diff, reproduction, and validation results were reviewed before submission.