Skip to content

refactor: Use uint64_t over size_t for serialize corruption check in fees.dat #248

Description

@kevkevinpal

mentioned in: bitcoin#34109

"It’s fine with me to limit this to the unsigned integer overflow fix.
A follow-up can be opened to further improve this and to validate the scale.
I brought it up as a suggestion for improvement in the review, and the comment can be linked in future discussions.

utACK fa1d17d" - ismaelsadeeq

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    followupThis is a possible follow-up someone can work onneed to confirmNeed to confirm if this is still needed or already done

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions