Skip to content

Use head state in more cases#16095

Merged
prestonvanloon merged 2 commits into
developfrom
use_head_more_cases
Dec 5, 2025
Merged

Use head state in more cases#16095
prestonvanloon merged 2 commits into
developfrom
use_head_more_cases

Conversation

@potuz

@potuz potuz commented Dec 4, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The head state is guaranteed to have the same shuffling and active indices if the previous dependent root coincides with the target checkpoint's in some cases.

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ran on mainnet for an hour. Reviewed the code and tests. LGTM

@james-prysm james-prysm left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just in terms of the explainations on slack and seeing that there are no bugs with the code as is, assuming that this approach is appropriate.

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit a2b84c9 Dec 5, 2025
18 checks passed
@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon deleted the use_head_more_cases branch December 5, 2025 04:09
prestonvanloon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
The head state is guaranteed to have the same shuffling and active
indices if the previous dependent root coincides with the target
checkpoint's in some cases.

(cherry picked from commit a2b84c9)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants