docs: add missing subscripts in sign definition#844
Merged
Conversation
sign definitionsign definition
Contributor
|
Thanks for flagging this. Yes, if you wouldn't mind backporting to previous spec versions, that would be helpful. |
oleksandr-pavlyk
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @kgryte. I've added the subscripts to past versions, too. |
kgryte
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looked like these subscripts were omitted.
LMK if this should be adjusted in 2012/2013 standards, but I think the intent is obvious enough that it doesn't need to be fixed in old versions.