bpo-41247: asyncio.set_running_loop() cache running loop holder#21401
Merged
Conversation
The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when calling set_running_loop. Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop.
1st1
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2020
Member
|
Wow, what a good catch. Thank you. |
Contributor
|
@tontinton: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Contributor
|
Thanks @tontinton for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8, 3.9. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2020
…onGH-21401) The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when calling set_running_loop. Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop. Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1 (cherry picked from commit 529f426) Co-authored-by: Tony Solomonik <tony.solomonik@gmail.com>
|
GH-21402 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
|
GH-21403 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2020
…onGH-21401) The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when calling set_running_loop. Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop. Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1 (cherry picked from commit 529f426) Co-authored-by: Tony Solomonik <tony.solomonik@gmail.com>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2020
…1401) The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when calling set_running_loop. Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop. Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1 (cherry picked from commit 529f426) Co-authored-by: Tony Solomonik <tony.solomonik@gmail.com>
shihai1991
pushed a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2020
…onGH-21401) The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when calling set_running_loop. Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop. Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The running loop holder cache variable was always set to NULL when
calling set_running_loop.
Now set_running_loop saves the newly created running loop holder in the
cache variable for faster access in get_running_loop.
https://bugs.python.org/issue41247
Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1