Skip to content

Switch back to the default checkout action#138739

Closed
bhack wants to merge 13 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
bhack:patch-8
Closed

Switch back to the default checkout action#138739
bhack wants to merge 13 commits into
pytorch:mainfrom
bhack:patch-8

Conversation

@bhack

@bhack bhack commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cc @malfet

The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: malfet/checkout@silent-checkout, actions/setup-python@v4. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/

https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688

@bhack bhack requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 20:26
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 23, 2024
@pytorch-bot

pytorch-bot Bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/138739

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 09ed5ff with merge base d298bd8 (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

malfet
malfet previously approved these changes Oct 23, 2024

@malfet malfet left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glad to see they've finally implemented it

@malfet malfet changed the title Switch back to the default ceckout action Switch back to the default checkout action Oct 23, 2024
@bhack

bhack commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Glad to see they've finally implemented it

It was actions/checkout#1067

But this other one is still not merged so I don't know if it is an issue for us:
actions/checkout#1454

@malfet

malfet commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Glad to see they've finally implemented it

It was actions/checkout#1067

But this other one is still not merged so I don't know if it is an issue for us: actions/checkout#1454

I can update my copy of action to use node20, because looks like checkout step is still much noisier than it used to be. On the other hand, I'm not sure if anyone still cares.
@ezyang is this still an issue to you?

@bhack

bhack commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I can update my copy of action to use node20, because looks like checkout step is still much noisier than it used to be

Can you point me to the log?

@bhack bhack force-pushed the patch-8 branch 2 times, most recently from c148463 to 28f7799 Compare October 23, 2024 21:30
@bhack bhack requested a review from malfet October 23, 2024 21:36
@bhack

bhack commented Oct 23, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I've completed the coverage, I don't know if in few cases quiet-checkout was missing already in main

steps:
- uses: malfet/checkout@silent-checkout
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

E.g. if quiet-checkout was missing here in main we could add show-progress: false here and in few other places

@ezyang

ezyang commented Oct 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Non hidden progress is annoying but if we need to upgrade I can deal

@bhack

bhack commented Oct 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@ezyang Where are you going to see the new actions logs? I still see the old one
immagine

@bhack

bhack commented Oct 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think that it is still cached and we are using the old one in the CI to test this.

@bhack

bhack commented Oct 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Can we do something to run these new actions in the CI?

@bhack

bhack commented Nov 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Can we try tun run the actions in this PR in the CI? As the CI seems to have ran the old cached one in main.

See the action log:
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11488525801/job/31975420465?pr=138739#step:2:26

@bhack bhack closed this Nov 5, 2024
@bhack bhack reopened this Nov 5, 2024
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot Bot dismissed malfet’s stale review November 5, 2024 14:21

This PR was reopened (likely due to being reverted), so your approval was removed. Please request another review.

@bhack

bhack commented Nov 5, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have made a dummy commit. I have also closed and reopened the PR but I still see the CI executing malfet/checkout@silent-checkout

@zou3519 zou3519 added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Nov 5, 2024
@bhack bhack closed this Dec 5, 2024
@bhack bhack reopened this Dec 5, 2024
@bhack

bhack commented Dec 5, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

What is the status of this?

@bhack

bhack commented Dec 11, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Resolved merge conflicts again

@bhack

bhack commented Dec 12, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There is no interest I am going to close it.

@malfet

malfet commented Dec 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@bhack I believe I've approved it a while back, not sure what happened to it

@bhack bhack reopened this Dec 18, 2024
@bhack

bhack commented Dec 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I've rebased this for two months with 11 messages/requests without reply. It is quite hard to contribute, I have another Docker PR parked and rebased by months.

@malfet

malfet commented Dec 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pytorchbot merge -f "Lint is green and otherwise it's a no-op"

@pytorchmergebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: Command `git -C /home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch commit --author="bhack bhack@users.noreply.github.com" -m Switch back to the default checkout action (#138739)

/cc @malfet

The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: malfet/checkout@silent-checkout, actions/setup-python@v4. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/

https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688
Pull Request resolved: #138739
Approved by: https://github.com/malfet
` returned non-zero exit code 1

On branch main
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/main'.

nothing to commit, working tree clean
Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@malfet

malfet commented Dec 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
image Anyone knows how to interpret this message? It looks like I've approved it a while back, but than somebody (or something) dismissed my review?

@bhack bhack requested a review from malfet December 20, 2024 23:36
@bhack

bhack commented Jan 22, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Diverged again

@bhack

bhack commented Feb 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

What do you want to do with this?

@bhack

bhack commented Feb 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@malfet it is constantly conflicting merge after merge. Do we want to close it?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale label Apr 15, 2025
@bhack

bhack commented Apr 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Too much time for a review since october 2024. I am closing this.

@bhack bhack closed this Apr 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open source Stale topic: not user facing topic category triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants