Switch back to the default checkout action#138739
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/138739
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)As of commit 09ed5ff with merge base d298bd8 ( FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
malfet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Glad to see they've finally implemented it
It was actions/checkout#1067 But this other one is still not merged so I don't know if it is an issue for us: |
I can update my copy of action to use node20, because looks like checkout step is still much noisier than it used to be. On the other hand, I'm not sure if anyone still cares. |
Can you point me to the log? |
c148463 to
28f7799
Compare
|
I've completed the coverage, I don't know if in few cases |
| steps: | ||
| - uses: malfet/checkout@silent-checkout | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| with: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
E.g. if quiet-checkout was missing here in main we could add show-progress: false here and in few other places
|
Non hidden progress is annoying but if we need to upgrade I can deal |
|
@ezyang Where are you going to see the new actions logs? I still see the old one |
|
I think that it is still cached and we are using the old one in the CI to test this. |
|
Can we do something to run these new actions in the CI? |
|
Can we try tun run the actions in this PR in the CI? As the CI seems to have ran the old cached one in See the action log: |
This PR was reopened (likely due to being reverted), so your approval was removed. Please request another review.
|
I have made a dummy commit. I have also closed and reopened the PR but I still see the CI executing |
|
What is the status of this? |
|
Resolved merge conflicts again |
|
There is no interest I am going to close it. |
|
@bhack I believe I've approved it a while back, not sure what happened to it |
|
I've rebased this for two months with 11 messages/requests without reply. It is quite hard to contribute, I have another Docker PR parked and rebased by months. |
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "Lint is green and otherwise it's a no-op" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: Command `git -C /home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch commit --author="bhack bhack@users.noreply.github.com" -m Switch back to the default checkout action (#138739) /cc @malfet
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688 Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
|
Diverged again |
|
What do you want to do with this? |
|
@malfet it is constantly conflicting merge after merge. Do we want to close it? |
|
Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as |
|
Too much time for a review since october 2024. I am closing this. |


/cc @malfet
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/11465627688