Skip to content

Add non-normative reference for XSLTProcessor#738

Closed
cvrebert wants to merge 1 commit into
whatwg:masterfrom
cvrebert:XSLTProcessor
Closed

Add non-normative reference for XSLTProcessor#738
cvrebert wants to merge 1 commit into
whatwg:masterfrom
cvrebert:XSLTProcessor

Conversation

@cvrebert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It still doesn't have a spec, but this seems to be the closest thing to one that currently exists.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XSLTProcessor

@foolip

foolip commented Feb 25, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I linked to https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/012853bd80b7/dom/webidl/XSLTProcessor.webidl in Blink's IDL files as the closest thing to a spec I could find. Neither of these are really good references though.

Is it better than nothing? I dunno, I kind of think not. @annevk?

@Ms2ger

Ms2ger commented Feb 25, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Create a wiki page for it, like we did for DOM XPath?

@annevk

annevk commented Feb 25, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Wow, all browsers support this. Yeah, a wiki page similar to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XPath and a bug against the DOM Standard. We should just define this.

@domenic domenic added the clarification Standard could be clearer label Feb 25, 2016
@annevk

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cvrebert is that something you would be interested in working on? Trying to figure out how to move forward here.

@cvrebert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@annevk Nope. Sprucing up the MDN article was enough work already, and I'm not an XSLTProcessor user.

@annevk

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@domenic

domenic commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

is the action item to update this PR to point to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor now?

@annevk

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I'm not sure, I was hoping someone else would make a call as to what is best here.

@domenic

domenic commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hmm. I guess https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor is pretty good as it collates all known info in one place. Alternately maybe we should leave it with no reference.

@foolip

foolip commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Pointing to https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/DOM_XSLTProcessor sounds good, at the very least it's a block of IDL that can be compared against the implementation.

@annevk

annevk commented Feb 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Okay, @cvrebert can you update the PR to point to that? Ta.

@cvrebert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@annevk Done.

annevk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2016
@annevk

annevk commented Mar 1, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Excellent, thank you. Landed as f5540d3. Love all these little fixes.

@annevk annevk closed this Mar 1, 2016
@cvrebert cvrebert deleted the XSLTProcessor branch March 1, 2016 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clarification Standard could be clearer

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants